They - they did not - they really pushed for a one-sided - the ultra - the ultra-oligarchic group did - the senate actually agreed to that plan. He called for an alliance, a mutual disarming of him, of his group and the aristocrats, who now had Pompey with them, and let the - as he said, Let the people at the senate and the people of Rome, through their assemblies, rule Rome, and we`ll have no armies. He knew he would be finished if he did that. Well, when he came back from Gaul, the aristocratic party wanted him to surrender his army and to appear and present himself. PARENTI: Oh, the word "emperor" hadn`t had the same meaning - commander. ![]() The Assassination of Julius Caesar offers a whole new perspective on an era we thought we knew well. In these pages we find reflections on the democratic struggle waged by Roman commoners, religious augury as an instrument of social control, the patriarchal oppression of women, and the political use of homophobic attacks. In The Assassination of Julius Caesar, the distinguished author Michael Parenti subjects these assertions of “gentlemen historians” to a bracing critique, and presents us with a story of popular resistance against entrenched power and wealth.Īs he carefully weighs the evidence concerning the murder of Caesar, Parenti sketches in the background to the crime with fascinating detail about wider Roman society. They have generally regarded Roman commoners as a parasitic mob interested only in bread and circuses, as Cicero’s “starving, contemptible rabble.” And they have cast Caesar, who took up the popular cause of the poor, as little better than an adventurer and a demagogue, presenting his murder as a personal feud or a constitutional struggle, devoid of social content. |a Initial Bemis load m2btab.test019 in 2019.Most historians, both ancient and modern, have viewed the Late Republic of Rome through the eyes of its rich nobility. ![]() |a Rome |x Politics and government |y 265-30 B.C. |a Includes bibliographical references (pages -260) and index. |a The assassination of Julius Caesar : |b a people's history of ancient Rome / |c Michael Parenti. "A highly accessible and entertaining addition to history." - Book Marks The Assassination of Julius Caesar offers a whole new perspective on an era thought to be well-known. In these pages, we find reflections on the democratic struggle waged by Roman commoners, religious augury as an instrument of social control, the patriarchal oppression of women, and the political use of homophobic attacks. As Parenti carefully weighs the evidence concerning the murder of Caesar, he adds essential context to the crime with fascinating details about Roman society as a whole. ![]() In doing so, he presents a provocative, trenchantly researched narrative of popular resistance against a powerful elite. In The Assassination of Julius Caesar, Michael Parenti recounts this period, spanning the years 100 to 33 BC, from the perspective of the Roman people. Most historians, both ancient and modern, have viewed the Late Republic of Rome through the eyes of its rich nobility-the 1 percent of the population who controlled 99 percent of the empire's wealth. "A provocative history" of intrigue and class struggle in Ancient Rome-"an important alternative to the usual views of Caesar and the Roman Empire" ( Publishers Weekly ).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |